Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Satyen Vaidya, J
Rajinder Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of H.P. and Ors. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner challenges termination, seeking reinstatement and benefits. (Para 2 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments regarding public law aspects and service contract validity. (Para 6 , 9 , 15) |
| 3. court’s reasoning on jurisdiction concerning private employment. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 4. final dismissal of the petition due to lack of merit. (Para 16) |
Satyen Vaidya, Judge
By way of instant petition, petitioner has prayed for following substantive reliefs:-
i. That the oral termination of the applicant may kindly be declared null and void and the respondents may kindly be directed to take back the services of the applicant forthwith with all consequential benefits of seniority etc.
ii. That the respondents may kindly be directed to pay all the arrears due and payable towards the applicant from the date of oral termination till the time the services of the applicant are taken back into service.
iii. That the appointment of respondent No. 6 may please be quashed.
2. The case as set-up by the petitioner is that he was orally appointed as Lecturer (Hindi and Sanskrit) on 23.01.1998 in D.A.V. P.G. College Daulatpur Chowk, Tehsil Amb, District Una, H.P. (for short the ‘College’). No appointment letter w
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
