IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA RSA No.300 of 2006 Reserved on: 22.08.2023 Date of Decision:11.09.2023 Mohinder Singh H ....Appellant Versus Gurbax Singh (since deceased) through his LRs o ...Respondents.

Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge.

Whether approved for reporting?1 Yes For the Appellant: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ajay Thakur, Advocate.

For the Respondents: Mr. Aman Sood, Advocate.

Rakes h Kainthla, Judge The present appeal is directed against the judgment & decree passed by the learned District Judge, Una vide which the appeal filed by the respondents (legal representatives of the original defendant before the learned Trial Court) was allowed and the judgment and decree passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Court No. 1, Amb, District Una, H.P. were set aside.

1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.

2. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to the present appeal are that the plaintiff filed a civil suit before the learned Trial Court for seeking the possession by removal of supper structure/Malwa over the land comprised in Khewat No. 99 min, Khatouni No. 222 min, Khasra No. 2282/1 measuring 0-0