Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Rakesh Kainthla, J
Manoj Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of H.P – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. quashing fir based on marriage and family circumstances. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. recognition of registered marriage by authorities. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. court emphasizes welfare of family and victims. (Para 7) |
| 4. established precedents for similar case outcomes. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 5. final ruling favors quashing fir to maintain family integrity. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
Manoj Kumar & another ....Petitioners Versus State of H.P ....Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting? No.
For the Petitioners : Mr. Peeyush Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Anuj Bali, Advocate.
For the Respondents/ : Mr. Lokender Kutlehria, Additional State Advocate General.
Rakesh Kainthla, Judge The present petition has been filed for quashing of F.I.R. No. 91 of 2023 dated 04.11.2023, registered H.P. for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 376, 506 of Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act) at Police _______________________
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.
Station Rainuka Ji, District Sirmour, H.P. and consequent proceedings arising out of t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
