Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Virender Singh, J
Har Krishan – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. nature of petitioner’s situation and request. (Para 1 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. respondents' arguments on the fir and accident details. (Para 8 , 9 , 11) |
| 3. eligibility to quash fir and standards for evaluation. (Para 12 , 13 , 16 , 19) |
| 4. application of judicial discretion in serious cases. (Para 15 , 18 , 21) |
| 5. outcome of the petition and final ruling delivered. (Para 22 , 23) |
Virender Singh, Judge (oral).
Petitioner-Har Krishan has filed the present petition, under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as ‘CrPC’), for quashing of FIR No.42 of 2022, dated 18.03.2022 (hereinafter referred to as the FIR, in question), registered with Police Station, Sundernagar, District Mandi, H.P., under Sections 279 , 337 and 338 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as the ‘IPC’), Sections 185 and 196 of the Motor Vehicles Act , (hereinafter referred to as the MV Act, as well as, the proceedings resultant thereto, which are stated to be pending before the Court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sundernagar, District Mandi, H.P.
(hereinafter referred to as the ‘trial Court’).
2. According to the petitioner, the said FIR has been regis
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
