IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
VIVEK SINGH THAKUR, J
SONU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF H.P. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition for quashing fir based on compromise. (Para 1 , 2) |
O R D E R
The instant petition, under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (h ereinafter referred to as ‘Cr.PC’) has been filed by petitioner, on the basis of compromise arrived at betweeun the private parties, for quashing of FIR No.80 of 2019, dated 9.10.2019, registered in Police Station Jubbal, District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code (in short ‘IPC’) and Sections 4 &6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (hereinafter referred to as ‘POCSO Act’).
2. Petitioner Sonu, complainant-respondent No.3 iGovind, respondent No.2 Neha Kumari, mother of complainant respondent No.4 Roshni Devi were present in person on 8.4.2022 and they were identified by their respective counsel. Their statements were separately recorded and placed on the file.
3. Complainant-respondent No.3 Govind had stated that on 9.10.2019 his daughter Neha informed him about her affairs with the petitioner and also about her physical violation …3…
by the petitioner on that day and, therefore, he alongwith his mother Roshni Devi and his daughter Neha visited the Pol.ice Station and r
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.