Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J
Manesh – Appellant
Versus
State of H.P. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. representation decisions must be timely made. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. court critiques delays in representation decisions. (Para 4) |
| 3. petitioners' grievances to be resolved within six weeks. (Para 5) |
Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?
For the petitioner(s): Mr. Rocky and Ravinder Chandel Advocates.
For the respondents: Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua , J Notice. Mr. L.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents in both the petitions.
2. These writ petitions have been filed for the grant of almost common substantive reliefs. Relief clause herein is extracted from CWP No. 9444/2025:-
“ Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction to the respondent department to extend the benefit of revised Pay Rules, 2022 amended on 06.09.2022 by inserting Rule 7-Aby granting higher stage of pay for some categories, posts as per schedule-II after completion of two years of regular service by revising the salary (Sr. No.37 Forest Guard) Rs.21300/- to Rs.30400/- as per the judgment dated 29.11.2024 passed in CWP No.1638 of 2024, titled as Mohit Sharma &Anr. V/s State of H.P. & Or
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
