Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Bipin Chander Negi, J
Suman – Appellant
Versus
Ashish Kuthiala – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. landlord-tenant dispute procedural background. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. court's observations on evidence presentation procedures. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. quashing of restrictive order allowing witness presentation. (Para 9) |
| 4. final disposition of the petition. (Para 10) |
Bipin Chander Negi, Judge (oral)
The present petition has been preferred against the impugned order dated 13.6.2025 passed by the Rent Controller, Shimla in case No. 267 of 2019. The present petitioner is the respondent/tenant therein and by virtue of the impugned order, the present petitioner has been restrained from leading any other evidence in support of her case other than the petitioner herself.
2. Heard counsel for the petitioner. Perused the record appended alongwith the present petition.
3. Admittedly in the case at hand, there is a landlord tenant dispute, the same is pending adjudication before the concerned Rent Controller, wherein the present petitioner is the respondent/tenant whose eviction is being sought.
4. Issues in the petition pending adjudication before the Rent Controller were framed on 16.8.2023. Steps f
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
