Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Rakesh Kainthla, J
Nikita Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of H.P. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts regarding the petition and compromise. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. court outlines prior judgments and rationale. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. final order and directives issued by the court. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
Nikita Sharma ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & others ....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting? No.
For the petitioner : Mr. Jeet Singh, Advocate.
For respondents : Mr. Lokender Kutlehria, Additional Advocate General for respondent No.1/State :
Ms.Pooja Verma, Advocate, for respondents No.2 and 3.
Rakesh Kainthla,Judge The petitioner has filed the present petition has been filed for quashing of F.I.R. No. 115 of 2024, dated 04.12.2024, registered for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 281 , 125(A) and 125(B) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita ( BNS ) 2023 and Sections 180 , 181, and 184 of Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act) at Police Station Kandaghat, District Solan, H.P.
2. It has been asserted that the matter has been compromised between the parties voluntarily. No fruitful purpose would be served by continuation of the proceedings. Hence, it was praye.d that the present petition be allowed and the F.I.R.as well
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
