Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Not specified, Not specified
YAMINI RANA – Appellant
Versus
HPSEBL AND ANOTHER – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the recruitment advertisement and the waiting list process. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. miscommunication and inactions regarding the recommendations from the waiting panel. (Para 8 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. legal implications of the notification abolishing the commission. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. court's concerns about the arbitrary nature of actions by the authorities. (Para 16 , 17 , 19 , 20) |
| 5. court's directive to ensure the petitioner is considered for appointment. (Para 21 , 22) |
Erstwhile Himachal Pradesh Subordinate Service Selection Commission, Hamirpur (in short ‘HPSSSC’), vide advertisement No. 36-3/2020 dated 21.09.2020, invited applications for filling up seven posts of Junior Draftsman (Civil) and 83 posts of Junior Draftsman (Electrical), having Post Code-838 (Annexure P-1). Petitioner herein, being fully eligible, applied for the aforesaid post. Though 3477 candidates had applied, but only 2438 were found eligible to participate in the objective test. Out of 2438 candidates, 1368 appeared in the screening test and 279 candidates, incluPding petitioner qualified the screening test. Thereafter, the final result was declared on 22.06.2022, wherein o
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
