Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Rakesh Kainthla, J
Vishal Rana – Appellant
Versus
State of H.P. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court references precedents allowing quashing of firs under ipc section 326. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
Rakesh Kainthla, Judge
The present petition has been filed for quashing of FIR No. 35 of 2021, dated 15.06.2021, registered for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 341 , 323 , 324 , 326 , 506 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code ( IPC ). It has been asserted that the matter has been compromised between the parties. The informant does not want to proceed further with the complaint because of the compromise effected between the parties. Hence, the petition.
2. The statement of the informant was recorded on 03.04.2025, in which he stated that he had entered into a compromise voluntarily with the accused without any influence from any person, and he has no objection in case the FIR is ordered to be quashed based on the compromise.
3. The matter reguarding the quashing of FIR registered for the commission oof an offence punishable under Section 326 of IPC was referCred to the Larger Bench. The Hon’ble Division Bench held in Vimal Kishore @ Vicky vs. State of HP and anr in Cr.MMO No. 81 of 2025 decided on 22.05.2025 that the matter was covered by a judgment of
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
