IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J
Rajesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of H.P. – Respondent
2. All these writ petitions have been filed for the grant of almost identical reliefs. The substantive relief in CWP No.10844 of 2025 reads as under:-
“a) Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction to the respondent department to extend the benefit of revised Pay Rules, 2022 amended on 06.09.2022 by inserting Rule 7-A by granting higher stage of pay for some categories, posts as per schedule-II afte r completion of two years of regular service by revisfing the salary (Sr. No.24 JBT) Rs.29700/- to Rs.37600/- as per the judgment dated 29.11.2024 passed in CWP No.1638 of 2024, titled as Mohit Sharma & Anr. V/s State of H.P. &
Ors. (Annexure P-4) in the interest of justice.”
3. According to the petitioners, the legal issue involved in these cases has already been adjudicated upon. The grievance of the petitioners is that their representations dated 25.05.2025, annexed with the respective writ petitions as Annexures P-5 and P-7, have still not been decided by the respondents/competent authority.
4. Once the legal principle involved in the iadjudication of present petition has already been decided, it is expected from the welfare State to consider and decide the representation of the aggr
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.