SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Online)(HP) 1143

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESHWAR THAKUR
SHIV RAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HP – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Kush Sharma ,Respondent Advocate: AG AG

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Cr. MP(M) No. 420 of 2020 Decided on : 18.3.2020 Shiv Ram …Petitioner Versus State of H.P.

…Respondent ___________________________________________

Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sureshwar Thakur, Judge.

Whether approved for reporting?

________C________________________________________

For the petitioner : Mr. Kush Sharma, Advocate.

For the respondent : Mr. Hemant Vaid and Mr.

Narender Guleria, Addl.

AGs with Mr.Vikrant Chandel and Mr. Narender Thakur, Dy. AGs, for the respondent-State.

Sureshwar Thakur, Judge (oral)

The instant petition, is, constituted under Section 438 of the Cr. P.C., where-through the bail-

applicant seeks indulgence, of, pre-arrest bail, in connection with FIR No. 61/18, of, 9.8.2018, constituting therein offences, under, Section 20, 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances, Act, registered, at, Police Staftion, Kandaghat, District Solan, H.P.

2. A perusal otf the status report, unfolds that the gross weight, of, the contraband, as allegedly recovered from the conscious and exclusive possession, of, principal accused Neeraj Sharma, being less than, commercial quantity thereof, rather, it, falling within, the, inter

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top