Malkiyat Singh @ Rinku ...Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others t ...Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge.

Whether approved for reporting?¹ No.

For the Petitioner : Mr. Divya Raj Singh, Advocate.

For Respondent No.1 : Mr. Jitender Sharma, Additional Advocate General.

For Respondents No.2 to 6 : Ms. Gayatri, Advocate.

Rakesh Kainthla, Judge The petitioner has filed the present petition for quashing of FIR No. 51 of 2018, dated 10.4.2018, registered at Police Station Dehra, District Kangra, H.P. for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 323, 324, 504 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the consequential proceedings arising out of the said FIR. It has been asserted that the dispute occurred due to a misunderstanding between the parties. An FIR

1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.

No. 52 of 2018, dated 10.4.2018, was registered by the opposite party. The parties have settled the matter to maintain cordial relations between them. Hence, the petition for quashing the FIR. 2. The police filed a status report asserting that the informant, Ankush Sharma, was removing the trolley from the tractor on 9.4.2018 a