Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Rakesh Kainthla, J
Meena Devi – Appellant
Versus
Anchal Ranaut – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of the complaint and accident. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. trial court's findings and evidence evaluation. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. arguments and claims by the appellant. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. legal standards for overturning acquittal. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. final decision on the appeal. (Para 19 , 20) |
The applicant/appellant (complainant before the learned Trial Court) has filed the present application for seeking leave to appeal against the judgment dated 23.03.2024 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Court No.1, Dharamshala (learned Trial Court), vide which, the complaint filed by the applicant/appellant was dismissed and the accused was acquitted of the commission of offences punishable under Sections 279 , 337, 338 and 304A of Indian Penal Code (in short ‘IPC’). (Parties shallhereinafter be referred to in the same manner as they were arrayed before the learned Trial Court for convenience.)
2. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise tHo the present application are that the complainant filed a complaint before the learned Trial Court for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 279 , 337, 338 and 304A of the IPC. It was asserted that Gurcharan (
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
