IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. MMO No.364 of 2025 Reserved on: 28.05.2025 Date of Decision: 24.06.2025 Pardeep Sharma & others ….Petitioners Versus Deepika Gautam ...Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge.

Whether approved for reporting? No.

For the Petiti oners : Mr. Tara Singh Chauhan, Senior h Advocate, with Mr. Surya Chauhan, Advocate.

For Respondent : Nemo Rakesh Kainthla, Judge The petitioners have filed the present petition against the order dated 21.02.2025 passed by learned l Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Court No.2, Ghumarwin, District Bilapsur, H.P. (learned Trial Court), vide which an application moved by the petitioners for ____________________

Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.

registration of the F.I.R. against the respondent for filing false affidavit was kept in abeyance. .

2. It has been asserted that the respondent filed an affidavit of assets and liabilities in which the entire assets were not disclosed. The petitioners filed an application for registration of the F.I.R. for filing a false affidavit. The reospondent filed a reply in which she admitted that she had not d isclosed her com