Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Rakesh Kainthla, J
Deep Raj – Appellant
Versus
State of H.P. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. set forth the factual background and nature of incidents leading to charges. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. accused denied allegations and argued inconsistencies. (Para 3 , 5 , 10) |
| 3. prosecution relied on witness testimony for conviction. (Para 4 , 6 , 8 , 11 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 4. court evaluated evidence standard under revisional jurisdiction. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 29) |
| 5. final determination leading to acquittal of the accused. (Para 34) |
Rakesh Kainthla, Judge
The present revision is directed against the judgment dated 13.05.2013 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Hamirpur, District Hamirpur, H.P. (learned Appellate Court) vide which the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 02.11.2011 passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate Hamirpur, District Hamirpur, H.P. (learned Trial Court) were upheld (Parties shall hereinafter be referred to in the same manner as they were arrayed before the learned Trial Court for convenience.)
2. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to the present petition are that police presented the challan before the learned Trial Court for the commission of offefnces punishable under Sections 279 and 337 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC)
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
