Bharat Pathania ...Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others t ...Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge.

Whether approved for reporting?¹ No.

For the Petitioner : M/s Jiwan Lal Sharma & Tek Chand Sharma, Advocate.

For Respondent No.1/State : Mr. Lokender Kutlehria, Additional Advocate General.

Rakesh Kainthla, Judge The present petition has been filed for quashing of FIR No. 93/24, dated 14.6.2024, registered for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 307 , 452, 323, 324, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code ( IPC ), at Police Station, Dharampur, District Mandi, H.P. and the consequential proceedings pending before the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. in case No. 1/2025 as per

1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.

the compromise effected between the parties. It has been asserted that, as per the prosecution, the informant’s husband used to quarrel with her on trivial matters. She left her matrimonial home on 17.5.2024. The petitioner and his parents visited her on 14.6.2024. The informant went to her room after taking the meals. The petitioner followed her and inflicted serious