Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Bipin Chander Negi, J
Abdullah and another – Appellant
Versus
Chuni Lal – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts detailing ownership claims and encroachment. (Para 8) |
| 2. arguments regarding possession and ownership. (Para 9) |
| 3. court's observations on demarcation validity. (Para 10 , 12) |
| 4. ratio on adverse possession and ownership proof. (Para 11 , 13) |
| 5. conclusion of appeal dismissal. (Para 15) |
Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander Negi, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Appellants: Mr. Gurmeet Bhardwaj, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mr. Anil Kapoor, Advocate, vice Mr.
oNimish Gupta, Advocate.
Bipin Chander NeCgi, Judge (oral).
The Appellant, by filing this appeal under section 100 of the Chode of Civil Procedure (for short, CPC), has assailed theg judgment and decree dated 13.01.2023 passed by Learned iDistrict Judge, Chamba, in Civil Appeal No. 46/2022 affirming the Judgment and Decree dated 01.09.2022 passed by the Civil Judge, Chamba, in Civil Suit No 400 of 2016.
2. The parties shall hereinafter be referred to in the same way as they were arrayed before the Trial Court.
3. The facts of the case, briefly stated are that the plaintiff instituted a suit seeking a decree for possession of the land comprised in Khasra No. 788/1, measuring 00-18-10 bighas,
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
