Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Rakesh Kainthla, J
Bhoovaneshwar Verma – Appellant
Versus
State of H.P. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. validity of compromise on criminal proceedings. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. court's duty to consider legal arguments. (Para 4) |
| 3. precedents for quashing based on compromise. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. orders related to authorities and document verification. (Para 7 , 8) |
Rakesh Kainthla, Judge The petitioner has filed the present petition for quashing of FIR No. 188 of 2024, dated 19.10.2024, registered at Police Station Dhalli, District Shimla, H.P. for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 281 and 125(a) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita , 2023 ( BNS ) and consequential proceedings i.e. Police Challan No. 4 of 2025, titled State of H.P. Vs. Bhooneshwar Verma, pending before learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Court No.6, Shimla, arising out of the said F.I.R. based on the compromise effected between the parties.
2. It has been asserted that the petitioner and informant have amicably settled the matter. They want to maintain cordial relations with each other. Hence, the petition.
3. Statement of inforrmant/injured Dharam Pal was recorded on 16.6.2025, in which he stated that he had entered into a compromise with the accused voluntarily without any influence from any person,
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
