IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Ajay Mohan Goel, J
Ghanshyam and others – Appellant
Versus
Sh. Govind Ram and others – Respondent
Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral)
Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that despite bgest endeavours, no instructions are coming forth from the ipetitioners nor requisite documents are being provided by the petitioners.
2. By way of this petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have prayed for the following reliefs:-
“It is, therefore, most humbly and as respectfully prayed that the present petition may kindly be allowed and order dated 10.11.2023 passed by the Ld. Additional District Judge, Sarkaghat, District Mandi, H.P. in Civil Misc. Appeal
2/2023 well as the order dated 19.12.2022 passed by Ld. Civil Judge, Court No. 2, Sarkaghat, DistricHt Mandi, H.P. in CMA No. 716/2021 in Civil Suit No. 276/21 may kindly be set aside and the application undefr Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC filed by the respondents may kindly be dismissed and justice be done.”
3. The petitioners are aggrieved by the order passed by learned Trial Court, in terms whereof, an application filed by the respondents under Oorder XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure , was allowed by learned Trial C
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.