Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Rakesh Kainthla, J
Chhabil Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of H.P. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks to quash fir based on compromise. (Para 1) |
| 2. informant states a compromise was made. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. court acknowledges the arguments presented. (Para 4) |
| 4. previous cases support quashing similar firs. (Para 5) |
| 5. decision to quash the current fir based on precedents. (Para 6) |
| 6. final ruling and procedural instructions. (Para 7 , 8) |
Rakesh Kainthla, Judge The petitioner has filed the present petition for quashing of FIR No. 13 of 2025, dated 8.3.2025, registered at Police Station Bangana, District Una, H.P. for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 281 and 125(a) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita ( BNS ), Section 187 of Motor Vehicles (MV) Act and consequential proceedings arising out of the said F.I.R. based on the compromise effected between the parties.
2. It has been asserted that the FIR was lodged due to some misunderstanding between the parties. The matter was reconciled with the intervention of the respectable persons of the locality, and the informant does not want to proceed further with the matter because of the compromise fhaving been effected between the parties. Hence the petition.
3. Statement of the informant/victim, Vivek Dutt
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
