Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ...Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge.

Whether approved for reporting? No.

For the petitioner : Mr. Jeevesh Sharma, Advocate.

For respondent No.1 / : Mr. Ajit Sharma, Deputy Advocate State General.

For respondents No.2 Mr. Abhinav Thakur, Advocate.

and 3 Rakesh Kainthla, Judge H The petitioner has filed the present petition for quashing of FIR No. 37 of 2025, dated 26.05.2025, registered at Police Station Kotkhai, Tehsil Kotkhai, District Shimla, H.P., for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 281 and 125(a) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 ( BNS ) as per the compromise effected between the parties.

2. It has been asserted that the petitioner and the victim have entered into a compromise voluntarily without any influence or coercion from any person after the registration of the FIR. The victim does not want to proceed further with the matter because of the compromise effected between the parties. Hence, the petition.

3. Statements of informant Bhagat Bahadur and the victim’s guardian Amar Bhadur Gosai were recorded on 15.07.2025, in which they stated that they had entered into a compromise with the accused voluntarily wi