Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Rakesh Kainthla, J
Lalit Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of H.P. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. marriage consent led to request for fir quashing. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. quashing of fir is justified to promote justice. (Para 5) |
| 3. precedents support quashing fir under similar circumstances. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. court concluded by quashing the fir. (Para 8 , 9) |
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr.M.M.O. No. 173 of 2025P Reserved on: 20.08.2025 Decided on: 27.H08.2025 Lalit Kumar ...…. Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and another …...Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the PeCtitioner: Mr. Rakesh Sharma, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Ajit Sharma, Deputy Advocate h General, for respondent No.1-State.
Mr. Ruchirangad Singh, Advocate, g for respondent No.2.
iRakesh Kainthla, Judge The petitioner has filed the present petition for quashing of F.I.R No.57 of 2024, dated 23.05.2024, registered at Police Station, Gohar, District Mandi for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 363 , 366 and 376(2) (n) of Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO).
Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?Ye
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
