For the respoondent: Mr. G.D. Verma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sumit Sharma, C Advocate. Satye n Vaidya, Judge (oral):

This Regular Second Appeal has been filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure (for short, Hthe Code) against the judgment and decree dated

23.9.2014, passed by the learned Additional District Judge (II), Kangra at Dharmshala in Civil Appeal No. 2-J/2014, whereby the judgment and decree dated 10.12.2013, passed by the learned Civil Judge (Jr. Division) Jawali, District Kangra, in Civil Suit No. 07/2003, has been affirmed.

Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2. The suit of the appellant/plaintiff has been dismissed by both the Courts. P 3. The appellant and respondents No. 1 to 8 are the sons and daughters of deceased Jagar Nath. After the death of Jagar Nath on 28.10.1995, mutation of inheritance of his estate was attested vide Mutation No. 30 dated 25.10.1997 in favour of legal heirs of Jagar Nath i.e. plaintiff, defendants No. 1 to 8 and wife of Jagar Nath, who later died.

4. The land described in para-1 of the plaint (for short the suit land) was also stated to be part of the estate ohf Jagar Nath.

g5. Respondents No. 1 to 8