IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J
Nitin Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Arrpit Aggarwal – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. dissolution of the partnership firm is not granted at this stage (Para 5) |
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
This petition moved under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short the ‘Arbitration & Conciliation Act’) seeks:-
i) To restrain the respondent/his representatives, assignees, agents, employees or any other persons acting on his behalf from carrying out any business operations in the name of M/s Vidhyasha Pharmaceuticals or transacting in the name of the Firm in any
ii) Closure of the production activities of the partnership firm till the dissolution of the firm gets completed;
iii) To H restrain the respondent from selling, transferring, alienating, encumbering or disposing of any goods, stock-in-trade, raw materials, finished goods, or any part of the inventory lying at the partnership firm; and for freezing the bank accounts int the name of the partnership firm. Further prayer has been made to appoint a Receiver to take possession, custody and control of the entire inventory of the partnership firm including all stock-in-trade, raw materials, finished goods and any other assets forming part of the firm’s inventory.
2. M/s Vidhyasha Pharmaceuti
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.