Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge.

Whether approved for rreporting?1 For the petitioners: Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, Advocate.

For the respondents: Mr. Rahul Thakur, Advocate.

Jyo tsna Rewal Dua , J Notice. Mr. Rahul Thakur, learned counsel, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

2. Petitioner an employee of the respondents-HRTC, feels aggrieved against order dated 10.07.2025 [Annexure P-5(colly)], whereby the respondents pursuant to the directions issued in previous writ petition instituted by her, though have ordered release of arrears on account of petitioner’s back date regularization in view of

1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes

Himachal Road Transport Corporation Vs. Lekh Ram etc. ² but restricted the payment of arrears in installments.

3. The case set up by the petitioner is that she was appointed under Kith and Kin Policy by the respondents on 16.05.2007 on contract basis. She preferred Raj Kaur Vs. HRTC seeking applicability of the judgment rendered