IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Ajay Mohan Goel, J
Khem Raj and another – Appellant
Versus
Mast Ram and others – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. final order regarding the dismissal of the application. (Para 6) |
Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral)
By way of this petition filed under Article 227 of the Chonstitution of India, the petitioners have challenged the order passed by the learned Trial Court dated 05.06.2023, in terms whereof, an application filed by the present petitioners under Order 7, Rule 14 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been rejected by learned Trial Court in the following terms:-
“5. In the present matter, the plaintiff has filed a suit for permanent prohibitory injunction for restraining the defendants from obstructing a path. Further, from the perusal of zimni orders, it is observed that both the parties have led their evidence and the matter was listed for arguments and subsequently the present application was filed.
6. According to the averments maHde in the application, it is observed that, the document sought to be produced is a spot map which is averred by thfe plaintiff that, it should have been annexed to the report of the naib tehsildar Sundernagar ie. EX. DW-2/A and that the defendant's evidence is incomplete.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.