IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.

FAO (MVA) No. 64 of 2022 a/w FAO (MVA) No. 45 of 2022 Reserved on: 29.05.2025 Date of decision: 26.09.2025 FAO (MVA) No. 64 of 2022 Rajinder Kumar o…Appellant Versus Vijay Kumari & Ors. …Respondents FAO (MVA) No. 45 of 2022 National Insurance Co. Ltd. ...Appellant Versus Pushap LCata & Ors. ...Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge.

Whether approved for reporting? Yes.

FAO (MVA) No. 64 of 2022 For the Appellant(s): Mr. Bhuvnesh Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Mr. Saurav Sharma, Mr. Shekhar Badola, Mr. Rupesh Mumar and Ms. Vishali Lakhanpal, Advocates, for the appellant.

FAO (MVA) No. 45 of 2022 Mr. Ashwani Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ishan Sharma and Ms. Nisha Nalot, Advocates, for the appellant. FAO (MVA) No. 64 of 2022 For the Respondents: Ms. Neelam Kaplas, Advocate, for respondents No. 1 to 3.

Mr. Neha Negi, Advocate, vice Mr. Ajay Kumar Dhiman, Advocate, for respondent No. 4.

Ms. Devyani Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Anirudh Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No. 5.

Mr. Vinay Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No. 6.

FAO No. 45 of 2022 Mr. Ajay Sharma, Sr. Advoate with Mr. Atharv Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No. 1 to 4.

Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, Advocate, for rrespondent No. 5.

Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge These appeals, for involvement of common question of facts Cand law to be adjudicated on the basis of similar evidence, are being decided together by this judgment.

2h. Both appeals have been preferred against the award gpassed by concerned Motor Accidents Claims Tribunals in two different claim petitions preferred by respective claimants on account of the death of two occupants of the car being driven by driver Rai Singh, which was owned by Rajinder Kumar.

3. Common facts in these appeals are that on 02.10.2015, at about 7:27 a.m., Manoj Kumar (deceased-victim in FAO No. 64 of 2022), Mohinder Singh (deceased-victim in FAO No. 45 of 2022), Kuldeep Singh, Rajinder Singh (owner of the vehicle) and Rai Singh (driver) were travelling to Shimla in Nano Car No. HP-68A-Temp.5592 and when the car reached near Tyala Da Ghat, near Bhota, in District Hamirpur, it struck with a truck No. HP-24D-2342 from back side, which was parked on kutcha gola outside the metalled road, leading to the death of Manoj Kumar and Mohinder Singh on the spot. Their postmortem was conducted. Regarding the incident, FIR No. 178, dated

02.10.2015, was registered in Police Staftion, Hamirpur, H.P.

4. FAO No. 45 of 2022

4(i). Dependents of Mohinder Singh preferred Claim Petition before Motor Acrcident Claims Tribunal, Hamirpur by filing Claim Petition No. MACT No. 44 of 2016, titled as Pushap Lata & Ors vs. Rajinder Kumar & Ors., wherein after taking into consideraCtion the pleadings and evidence on record, the MACT has awarded compensation in favour of claimants amounting to Rhs. 63,11,599/- with interest therein @ 7.5% per annum from gthe date of filing the petition till its realisation with direction that the compensation shall be paid to the claimants by Insurance Company being insurer. This award has been assailed by filing FAO No. 45 of 2022.

4(ii). Deceased Mohinder Singh was serving as Senior Assistant in HRTC and his monthly salary was Rs. 38,105/-, as is evident from Last Pay Certificate Ex.PW1/A, issued by the Regional Manager, HRTC.

4(iii) Deceased was 45 years old. Claimant No. 1 is wife, claimants No. 2 and 3 are children and claimant No. 4 is mother of deceased Mohinder Singh.

4(iv) FIR in this matter has been placed on record as Ext. PW3/A, postmortem report has been placed as Ext. PW4/A. Insurance of the vehicle and Sale Certificate have been placed on record by owner of the vehicle i.e. RW-1 Rajinder Kumar as Ext. R-1 and Ext. R-2. f

5. FAO No. 64 of 2022

5(i). Dependents of Manoj Kumar preferred Claim Petition before Motor Accident Clarims Tribunal-I, District Kangra, H.P. by filing Claim Petition No. MACT No. 65 of 2016, titled as Vijay Kumari & Ors vs. Rai Singh & O