IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Satyen Vaidya, J
Sanjeev Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Sanjay Kumar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. land ownership and possession (Para 3 , 4) |
| 2. claims of unauthorized construction (Para 5 , 6) |
Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the appellant: Mrr. G.D. Verma, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Sumit Sharma, Advocate.
For the respondent: Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Senior Advocate, o with Mr. Gaurav Chaudhary and Mr. Ruchirangad Singh, Advocates.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Satyen Vaidya, Judge This Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been filed by the appellant/plaintiff against judgment and decree dated H30.04.2015, passed by learned District Judge, Hamirpur, (H.P.) in Civil Appeal No. 96 of 2012 whereby the judgment and decree dated 19.03.2012 passed by learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Hamirpur, H.P. in Civil Suit No. 95 of 2008 has been reversed and set-aside.
2. The parties hereinafter shall be referred to by the same status as they held before the learned trial Court.
3. The land comprised in Khata No. 65, Khatauni No.198, Khasra No. 1196
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.