Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Ajay Mohan Goel, J
Ganesha Motors – Appellant
Versus
Amit Kumar Guleria – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts of complaint regarding vehicle repair and payment. (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. arguments presented by both sides regarding liability. (Para 2) |
| 3. court's review of findings and decision on appeal. (Para 4) |
Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral)
i By way of this writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for the petitioners have prayed for the following reliefs:-
“i) Allow the Petition against the Final Order dated 05.08.2024 passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi in Revision Petition No. 1972 of 2024 (Annexure P-8) same may be quashed and set aside consequently dismissing the Complaint filed by predecessor in interest of respondent No. 1.”
2. I have heard learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as learned Counsel for the respondents.
3. A perusal of the record demonstrates that the predecessor-in-interest of respondents 1(a) to 1(d) (original complainant) filed a complaint under the Consumer Protection Act praying for issuance of a dirtection to the present petitioner for the repair of the vehicle free of cost as well as for compensation for harassment. A
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
