IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Bipin Chander Negi, J
Dev Raj – Appellant
Versus
The Sub Divisional Collector Una – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. discussion on procedural compliance and validity of pending appeals. (Para 1) |
| 2. clarification of joint possession of land and correction of judgment errors. (Para 2 , 3) |
Bipin Chander Negi, Judge (oral).
Heard counsel for the parties, perused the gimpugned order and the records appended along with the ipetition.
2. Appeal inter se the private parties was decided by the District Judge, Una in Civil Appeal No.75/2007 on 16.12.2008. While allowing the appeal, the following relief had been granted by the First Appellate Court. The same reads as follows:-
Relief:- 21. Judged in the light of my findings on the foregoing point, the appeal succeeds partly and is allowed in part. Suit of the plaintiff is decreed to the extent that the entries in the name of defendant as Kabiz over the suit land
are null and void and not binding upon the right, title or interest of the plaintiffs and the plaintiffs are declared to be in joint possession of the suit land as tenants. To this extent .
the judgment and decree passed by the ld.trial court is set aside. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case there i
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.