Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
RANJAN SHARMA
Pritam Singh – Appellant
Versus
Himachal Road Transport Corporation – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition challenges removal post-conviction during custody. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. ccs(cca) rule 19 mandates post-conviction penalty consideration. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. conviction does not warrant automatic removal; consider circumstances. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
JUDGMENT :
Ranjan Sharma, Judge
Petitioner [Pritam Singh] has filed two writ petitions [CWPOA No. 3249 & 6860 of 2020] with the following prayers.
Prayer in CWPOA No. 3249 of 2020
Petitioner, Pritam Singh, after having removed from service has assailed the removal orders dated 15.01.2016 [Annexure A-1], seeking the following reliefs:-
(i) That the impugned officer order dated 15.01.2016 [Annexure A-1] may kindly be quashed and set aside.”
(ii) That the respondents may kindly be directed to reinstate the applicant in service with all consequential benefits.
(iii) That the respondents may kindly be directed to decide the pending appeal of the applicant [Annexure–A-2] within a time bound period.
(iv) That the respondents may kindly be directed to regularize the services of the applicant without any discrimination after completion of one year with all consequential benefits like; seniority pay- fixation and arrears
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
