IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA FAO No. 29 of 2024 Reserved on: 17.11.2025 Date of decision: 2.7.11.2025 ________________________________________________

Daulat Ram & others.

…..Appellants.

Versus Ranjit Kaur.

……Respondent.

_______________________ _________________________

Coram The Hon'ble Mr. Justrice Sushil Kukreja, Judge.

1 Whether approved for reporting?

________________________________________________

For the appellants: Mr. J.R. Poswal, Advocate. For the respondent: Mr. Mohit Jaitak, Advocate (through Video Conferencing).

S ushil Kukreja, Judge.

The instant appeal is maintained by the appellants, who were plaintiffs before the learned Trial Court (hereinafter referred to as “the plaintiffs”) under Order 43 Rule-1 (U) read with Section 104 CPC against the judgment dated 26.08.2023, passed by learned Additional District Judge-II, Una, District Una, H.P., whereby the appeal preferred by the respondent herein, who was defendant before the learned Trial Court (hereinafter referred to as “the defendant”) was allowed and the judgment and decree

1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

passed by learned Senior Civil Judge, Una, District Una, H.P.,