IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA .

FAO No. 31 of 2024 Reserved on: 1.7.11.2025 Date of deciHsion: 27.11.2025 ________________________________________________

Daulat Ram & others.

…..Appellants.

Versus Ashok Kumar.

……Respondent.

________________________________________________

Coram r The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge.

1 Whether approved for reporting?

________________________________________________

For the appellants: Mr. J.R. Poswal, Advocate. For the respondent: Mr. Mohit Jaitak, Advocate (through Video Conferencing).

hSushil Kukreja, Judge.

The instant appeal is maintained by the appellants, who were plaintiffs before the learned Trial Court (hereinafter referred to as “the plaintiffs”) under Order 43 Rule-1 (U) read with Section 104 CPC against the judgment dated 26.08.2023, passed by learned Additional District Judge-II, Una, District Una, H.P., whereby the appeal preferred by the respondent herein, who was defendant before the learned Trial Court (hereinafter referred to as “the

1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

defendant”) was allowed and the judgment and decree passed by learned Senior Civil Judge, Una, District Una, H.P.,