IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Civil Revision No.172/2025.

Date of Decision: 27th November, 2025.

The HP State Cooperative Agriculture and Rural DevelopmPent Bank Ltd. .....Petitioner Versus Ramesh Kumar Sood ….Respondent Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander Negi, Judge.

Whether approved for reporting?1 f For the Petitioner: Mr. Hamender Singh Chandel, Advocate.

For the Respondent: Mr. Y.P. Sood, Advocate.

Bipin Chander Negi, Judge (oral).

The present petition has been preferred against impugned order dated 05.07.2025, passed by the appellate authority, upholding the eviction order passed by the Rent Controller, vide order dated 18.05.2024.

2. Heard counsel for the parties, perused the impugned orders and the pleadings appended along with the present gpetition.

3. Based on the pleadings of the parties following issues were framed before the learned Rent Controller:-

1. Whether the respondent being tenant has carried out material additions and alterations in the tenanted premises without the consent of the petitioner? OPP.

2. Whether the demised premises is bona fidely required by the petitioner for his own use and occupation? OPP.

3. Whether the demised premises is bona