IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.5973 of 2024 Date of Decision: 17.11.2025 __________________________________________________________

Shri Roshan Lal ……..Petitioner Versus H State of H.P. and Others ….Respondents __________________________________________________________

Coram:

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge.

Whether approved for reporting? ¹ For the Petitioner: Mr. Nishant Khidtta, Advocate.

For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol, Additional Advocate General. __________________________________________________________

Sandeep Sharma, Judge (oral):

By way of instant petition, petitioner has prayed for following main reliefs:

C“I. That the impugned orders dated 07.10.2016 (Annexure P-14) and order dated 14.08.2019 (Annexure P-16) passed by the respondents may kindly be quashed and set aside.

II. That the Respondents may kindly be directed to grant work charge hstatus to the Petitioner w.e.f. 01.01.1994 and fixation of pay notionally w.e.f. 01.01.1994 and grant of arrears of salary w.e.f. 16.08.2001 i.e. on actual basis from the date of Award till date with interest throughout.

gFurther, the respondents may kindly be directed to superannuate the Petitioner after att