Back
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
H. S. Thakur, *V. P. Gupta, JJ.
Naresh Kumar Varmani (Dr.) v. State of H. P. and Others
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. common questions regarding admission criteria. (Para 1 , 2 , 5) |
| 2. petitioner's claims regarding seat allotment. (Para 3 , 4 , 10) |
| 3. disputes over hospital categorization. (Para 6 , 8 , 11) |
| 4. rural service experience impacts eligibility. (Para 9 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. government's stance on categorization policy. (Para 17 , 19 , 20) |
| 6. clarity on prospectus's admission criteria. (Para 23 , 25 , 27) |
| 7. court's interpretation on categorical service. (Para 30 , 34 , 39) |
| 8. court's directions on filling seats. (Para 45 , 46 , 47) |
1. All these writ petitions can conveniently be disposed of by a common judgment as almost common questions of law and facts are involved in all of them. The facts of each petition are, however, being narrated separately. C. W. P. No. 309 of 1983.
2. The petitioner in this case passed his M. B. B. S. examination in the year 1980 from the Himachal Pradesh University and did his house job in the Discipline of Orthopaedics from 1981 to 1982 in the Snowdon Hospital, Shimla. Post graduate Degree and Diploma Courses awe held in Himachal Pradesh Medical College, Shimla. For these courses there are several Disciplines, as mentioned in the Prospectus of the Medical
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
