SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Online)(HP) 1

HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
, CJ
Padam Dev – Appellant
Versus
Girdhari Lal – Respondent


Table of Content
1. importance of law enforcement's duty to uphold the rights of individuals. (Para 1 , 2)
2. responses by police officials about incidents affecting the petitioners. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
3. recapitulation of intense police interactions that prompted the petitions. (Para 7 , 8)
4. evidence presents nonconformity to lawful arrest practices. (Para 9 , 12 , 14)
5. judicial remedies against police misconduct depict enforcement of fundamental rights. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32)

1. On September 23, 1986, Padam Dev and Ishwar Lal addressed a written complaint to one of us (Hon'ble the Chief Justice) whereby they alleged certain acts of harassment and high - handedness committed by the police personnel, namely, Girdhari Lal; A.S.I., Surinder Kumar and Hem Raj, constables against them. Having taken into consideration all the material facts and circumstances of the case, the letter was registered as a writ petition.

2. Shri Ishwar Lal, one of the petitioners, has been running a tailoring shop in Jungabazar for the last 15 to 20 years and was also having a residential house near his shop where he has been living with his family members all these years. The other complainant, Padam Dev,













































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top