SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Online)(HP) 4

HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
, J
Jagat Singh Negi v. Secretary H.P. Vidhan Sabah Shimla and Others


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Counsel
For the Respondents: Counsel

1. The petitioner, who is an Ext. MLA, has approached this Court by filing the present writ petition for quashing the impugned order dated 3.10.2008 Annexure P - 2 issued by the 2nd respondent though permitting thereby the petitioner to take treatment from Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, however, restricted his entitlement to reimbursement of the expenses he incurred upon his treatment as per the rates of AIIMS, New Delhi, on the basis of clause 9.7 of the Policy decision dated 21.6.2008 Annexure P - 3 being illegal and arbitrary and also for issuing a direction to the respondents to reimburse the entire amount, he actually spent on his treatment.

2. The petitioner had to transplant his kidney and was under treatment in Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi. He remained hospitalized during the period from 11.9.2007 to 28.1.2008 and incurred upon an expenditure of Rs. 9,97, 348/- on his treatment. The Director Health Services, Himachal Pradesh had allowed him to undergo treatment in Sir Ganga Ram, Hospital. He submitted all the bills for payment to the 1st respondent, who in turn referred the matter to the 2nd respondent vide Annexure P - 1. The 2nd respondent had conveyed the approv













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top