SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Online)(HP) 3

HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
, J
M/s. Tripura Colonizers Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
M/s. Hydro Construction Power – Respondent


Table of Content
1. legal challenge regarding vehicle custody based on ownership. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. court discusses evidence and applicable law related to custody. (Para 4 , 5)
3. court found the earlier ruling legally unsustainable. (Para 6)
4. conclusion: interim vehicle custody granted to registered owner. (Para 7 , 8)

1. The challenge herein is to the order Annexure P - 3, in an application under S.451, CrPC, passed by learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Rampur, Distt. Shimla filed by complainant M/s. Hydro Construction Power through its Manager Shri Megh Singh Thakur and another by accused Naresh Kumar in FIR No. 60/12 dated 26.06.2012 under S.451, S.379, S.506 read with S.34 of Indian Penal Code , Police Station, Jhakri, Distt. Shimla, one of Directors of M/s. Tripura Colonizers Pvt. Ltd. whereby the custody of the vehicle i.e. Transit Mixer bearing registration No. HP - 49A - 0238 has been entrusted to the complainant.

2. The legality and validity of the impugned order has been assailed by the accused - petitioner on the grounds inter alia that custody of the vehicle could have not at all been given to the complainant, being not lawful owner whereof nor in lawful possession.






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top