IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Chander Bhusan Barowalia, JJ
Madhu Sharma & Another – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh & Others – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to the election of respondent regarding concealment of criminal charges. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding jurisdiction and the validity of suspension. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. court’s examination of disclosure and authority's discretion in suspension. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
1. The present letter patent appeal is maintained by the appellants - petitioners against the judgment passed by learned Single Judge, in applications CMPs No.3917 and 3918 of 2018 in a case CWP No.1831 of 2017, titled Madhu Sharma & Another versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others. The applicants in the said applications have been added as party respondents in the writ petition and interim order which was in favour of the appellants - petitioners / Non - applicants, has been vacated.
2. Briefly stating the facts, which have come on the record by way of the pleadings of the parties in the present letter patent appeal, are that respondent No.5 Shri Amit Kumar in the present letter patent appeal, as per the appellants - petitioners, while filing his nomination papers for contesting election as Ward Member of Nagar Panchayat, Baijnath, concealed vital informa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.