Back
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Virender Singh, J.
Hariman Negi – Appellant
Versus
Parma Nand – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conviction and sentence overview. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. attempts to appeal post-conviction. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. application for compounding under s.138. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. review and maintainability issues. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. court's decision and reasoning. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
1. Applicant Hariman Negi has filed the present application in Criminal Revision No. 120 of 2009, which has been decided by this Court on 26.07.2016, for the following relief: -
"It is, therefore, prayed that a lenient view may kindly be taken and the offence under S.138 of the negotiable instruments act 1981, judgments passed by the ld. JMIC, Court No.2 Rohru, Distt. Shimla in case No. 13/3 of 2005, dated 13.03.2006 and upheld by the Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court Shimla (Camp at Rohru) in case No.16 - R / 10 of 2008/06, and further revision No. 120/2009 dismissed by this Hon'ble Court and SLP (Crl) No. 006481/2018, dismissed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India. May kindly be ordered to be compounded in the interest of equity and fair play."
2. Perusal of the record of Criminal Revision No. 120 of 2009 shows that the applicant has been convicted for the offence p
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
