Back
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Mr. , J
Nuvision Commercial and Escort Services v. State of Himachal Pradesh
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition outlines grounds for quashing tender process. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. petitioner argues against eligibility of private respondent based on prior blacklisting. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. state's defense regarding the timeline of blacklisting and qualifications. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. court examines and clarifies terms around blacklisting and eligibility. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. court issues directive based on findings regarding eligibility. (Para 17 , 18) |
1. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has primarily prayed for the following reliefs: -
"i) That a writ in the nature of certiorari may kindly be issued for quashing the proceedings of technical evaluation of e - tender opening for security services for Zonal Hospital Mandi held on 24.04.23 Annexure P - 7, to the extent whereby the respondent No. 5 has been adjudged as qualified and has further been admitted for financial bid.
ii) That a writ in the nature of mandamus may kindly be issued for directing the Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 to carry out the tender process strictly in accordance with notice inviting tender dated 1.04.2023."
2. The case of the petitioner is that it is a partnership firm
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
