IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWPOA No. 6532 o.f 2019 Decided on: 27.11.2025 ____________________________________________________________

Tarsem Singh and others ….Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others …Respondents Coram: o Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge

1 Whether approved for reporting? Yes.

For the petitioners: Mr. Adarsh K. Vashista, Advocate.

For the respondenuts: Mr. Amit Kumar Chaudhary, Deputy Advocate General, for o respondents- State.

Ranjan Sharma, Judge Petitioners, Tarsem Singh and 29 others had instituted an Original Application No. 1983 of 2019, which stood transferred to the State Administrative H Tribunal and upon its abolition the same stands transferred to this Court as CWPOA No. 6532 of 2019 seeking the following reliefs:-

(i) that the impugned Annexure A-4, dated 16.01.2019, whereby Respondent No.2 has rejected the representation made by the Applicants may kindly

1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

be quashed and set-aside.

(ii). That the Respondents may kindly be directed to treat applicants as regular appointees from the date of their initial appointment i.e. w.e.f. year 1999 alongwith al