IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA RSA No. 342 of 2016 Date of decisio.n: 26.11.2025.

Rajinder Singh …..Appellant Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ...Respondents Coram:

The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the appellant : Mr. J. S. Bhogal, Senior Advocate, with M/s. Tarunjeet Bhogal, Swati Verma & Srishti Verma, Advocates.

For the respondents : Mr. Gautam Sood, Deputy Advocate General.

Satyen Vaidya, Judge (Oral):

The instant Regular Second Appeal has been filed by the appellant/plaintiff under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code (for short “CPC”) against the judgment and decree dated 30.05.2016, passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Chamba, in Civil Appeal No. 927 of 2014, whereby the judgment and decree dated 21.11.2014, passed by the learned Civil Judge Junior Division, Dalhousie, District Chamba, in Civil Suit No. 45 of 2010, has been set aside and the suit of the appellant/plaintiff has been dismissed.

Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2. The appellant/plaintiff had filed a suit seeking declaration to the effect that Office Order dated P31.07.2009, passed by the Superintending Engine