SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(HP) 9078

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN SHARMA
Manglu Ram – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HP – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Sanjay Kumar Sharma ,Respondent Advocate: AG

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWPOA No.1799 of 2019 Decided on : 14.11.2025 _______________________________________________________

Manglu Ram ...Pe.titioner versus H State of Himachal Pradesh and others ...Respondents Coram:

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge

1Whether approved for reporting? No For the petitioner: rMr. Sanjay Sharma, Advocate.

For the respondents: Mr. Sumit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents-State.

Ranjan Sharma, Judge Petitioner, Manglu Ram, initially filed a writ petition CWP No.2688/2012 which was transferred to Learned State Administrative Tribunal and abolition of Tribunal, the matter transferred to this Court as CWPOA No.1799 of 2019 seeking the following relief:-

“That the respondents may kindly be directed to offer the appointment to the post of T.G.T. (Arts) to the petitioners.”

FACTUAL MATRIX:

2. Grievance is that the petitioner belongs to IRDP and Schedule Tribe Category and he passed his Graduation in Arts in April 1999 and Master in Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

Political Science in June 2002. Petitioner is a physically challenged, being suffering from locomotive impairment to the ex

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top