SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(HP) 9250

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KAINTHLA
SOHAN LAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HP – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:G R PALSRA ,Respondent Advocate: AG

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

Cr. Revision No. 198 of 2014

Reserved on: 06.11.2025

Date of Decision: 04.12.2025.

Sohan Lal f ...Petitioner

Versus

State of H.P. ...Respondent

Coram

Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge.

Whether approved for reporting?1 No

For the Petitioner : Mr G.R. Palsra, Advocate.

For the Respondent/State : Mr Lokender Kutlehria,

Additional Advocate General.

Rakesh Kainthla, Judge

The present revision is directed against the judgment

dated 20.06.2014, passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge (I), Mandi, H.P. (learned Appellate Court), vide which the judgment of conviction dated 22.06.2011 and order of sentence dated 27.06.2011 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Court No.2, District Mandi, H.P. (learned Trial Court) were

1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.

upheld. (Parties shall hereinafter be referred to in the same manner as they were arrayed before the learned Trial Court for convenience.) 2. Briefly stated, the facts giving rHise to the present revision are that the police presented a challan before the learned Trial Court for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 323, 341, 504, 506

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top