2025:HHC:43570

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA

RSA No. 90/2016

Reserved on: 28.11.2025 Decided on: 12.12.2025

Khushal Chand & ors. …..Appellants

Versus

Kanchna Devi & ors. ….Respondents ______________________________________________________________

Coram:

The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge.

Whether approved for reporting?1 Yes

For the Appellants: Mr. Varun Chauhan, Advocate, vice Mr.

CVivek Sharma, Advocate.

For the Respondent: Mr. C. N. Singh, Dr. Nidhi Singh &

Mr. Anshul Gandhi, Advocate, for

h respondents No. 1 and 2.

Romesh Verma, Judge

i The present appeal arises out of the judgment and

decree, dated 28.10.2015, as passed by the learned District Judge, Hamirpur, whereby the appeal preferred by the respondents/defendants has been allowed and the suit filed by

the appellants/plaintiffs was ordered to be dismissed.

1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.

2 Brief facts of the case are that the appellants/plaintiffs filed a suit in the Court of learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Court No.II, Hamirpur on 21.8.2006 for declaration with consequential relief of permanent .prohibitory injunction. In the plaint, it was averred by the appellan