IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

CR No.154 of 2025

Decided on: 12.12.2025

Gian Chand ….Petitioner

Versus

Meena Kumari ...Respondent

Coram

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge

Whether approved for reporting?

For the petitioner: Mr. Rakesh Kumar Dogra, Advocate.

For the respondent: Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with

Ms. Rinki Kashmiri and Mr. Pranjal

C Munjal, Advocates.

Satyen Vaidya, Judge (Oral)

hThe petitioner-judgment debtor, by way of instant

gpetition, has invoked the revisional jurisdiction of this Court to

assail order dated 12.08.2025, passed by learned Senior Civil Judge, Mandi, H.P. in Objection Petition No.4 of 2025, whereby the objections filed by the judgment debtor to the execution of

decree have been dismissed.

2. Brief facts necessary for adjudication of the petition are that the respondent herein (hereinafter referred to as “decree holder”) is holder of a decree dated 28.05.2010, passed by learned Civil Judge, Junior Division, Court No.4, Mandi, District

Mandi, H.P. in Civil Suit No.43/07. The decree reads as under:

“48. In sequel to the foregoing discussion on aforesaid issues, I do hereby decreed theP suit of plaintiff to the following effects:

I Plaintiff is ent