IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

Cr.M.P.(M) No.2687 of 2025

Reserved on: 02.12.2025

Decided on: 12.12.2025

Darshan Singh ...…. Petitioner

Versus

State of Himachal Pradesh …...Respondent

Coram

Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge.

Whether approved for reporting?¹ No

For the PeCtitioner: Mr Rajesh Kumar, Advocate.

For the Respondent: Mr Ajit Sharma, Deputy Advocate

General.

Rakesh Kainthla, Judge

The petitioner has filed the present petition seeking

regular bail in F.I.R. No. 126/2025 dated 18.04.2025, registered at Police Station, Nalagarh, District Solan, H.P., for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 103 & 61(2)

of the Bhartiya Nayaya Sanhita (BNS) 2023.

2. It has been asserted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated. He is a business person and has deep roots in society. He has been in judicial custody since 19.04.2025. The

Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?No

allegations of murder attributed to him are wholly incorrect.

The petitioner did not murder any person; rather, he had. tried to save the deceased from the co-accused. The role attributed to the petitioner, even if accepted at face valuHe, does not satisfy the